Zoom Recording ID: 83428698853
UUID: v+9deS3aRO2Pa1o9cD30qg==
Meeting Time: 2026-05-01 04:33:23pmGMT
As social media becomes an important source of political information in many democracies, citizens are increasingly exposed to misleading content that distorts public discourse and weakens trust in institutions. While most current initiatives assume that misinformation persists because citizens lack the skills, motivation, or attention needed to evaluate information accurately, we argue that it is a feature of relational information environments. Deviating from current individual-level approaches to combating misinformation, we designed and implemented in-person workshops for voting-age adults combining media literacy training, role-playing exercises, and group discussions on information integrity. These sessions encouraged participants to assess content credibility, navigate disagreement, and reflect on the civic impact of sharing information. We present findings from a randomized controlled trial in 160 villages across the Philippines, a country often cited as an early case of social media-driven democratic backsliding. Treated individuals perceived less political polarization and reported greater interest in politics. They relied less on Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok for political news and engaged more frequently in offline discussion through civic and religious networks. Comparable effects among untreated peers indicate meaningful community-level spillovers. Effects also extended to electoral outcomes: using official village-level electoral results, we find that, in treatment villages, candidates who relied heavily on Facebook advertising underperformed and voters were less responsive to false online rumors about local candidates. In-person, community-based interventions can change how people engage with political information, strengthening both informational integrity and democratic accountability.