What if...citizens only want more walls, cameras, surveillance, cars, tesla tunnels, parking lots, etcs.. as some sort of dystopian dysfunctional future city? What if people have no interest or hope for any better future for their own community? What can urban planners do to overcome these challenges when working with community development? In this lecture, we will discuss the case study of the Homeless Workers Movement (MTST) in Brazil and withdraw lessons on how community organizers or any planners directly engaged with communities could potentially facilitate processes that open up the collective imagination. In MTST, their insurgent planning practices produced shifts on how people perceived their territories, themselves, and their futures - moving from hopeless, to "the desire for a house with a car in the garage," to a "desire for the city," an embodied and active right to the city. We will discuss the practical role of planners, as mediators of social learning processes in three interconnected dimensions: making territories visible (to residents and to the government); making people visible to themselves (to see and be seen as an individual, part of a community, citizen); and finally, based on the previous two dimensions, making futures visible (to move from hopelessness to sensorial images of alternative futures).